Archive for the ‘└ Design Reviews’ Category

12 Apr 2007

Design Review Notes: Buildings Study by Adrian Taylor

Malpas Rd – Mowbray House Surgery (view case study)

  • Client input important. Traditional procurement enabled greater control.
  • Building designed for context and cost effective solution.
  • Spend money where is counts.
  • Glass blocks and colour create joy.
  • Client has taken ownership and cared for building well.
  • NHS love the building.
  • First floor set back to create domestic scale.
  • Underfloor heating removes clutter.
  • Concern over too much glazing and overheating – need more sophisticated heat recovery and heat extraction system.

‘Inspire’ Hornbeam Business Park Harrogate (view case study)

  • Client wanted iconic building and led the design development.
  • Detailing had to be precise.
  • Glass to glass junctions  - no curtain walling.
  • Simple detailing driven by the client.
  • ‘Coolite’ glass reduces heat gain.
  • Single stair building pushed to the limit.

‘One life’ – Middlesbrough (view case study)

  • Building brief grew over time – client led the process.
  • Major changes to suit budget.
  • Traditional contract allowed more freedom of design.
  • Fulfils what primary care building should be.
  • Detailing affects programme – Detailing of ceramic black tiles and rainscreen cladding could have been simplified to reduce pressure on programme and costs.
  • Natural lighting enhance spaces and waiting areas.
  • Traditional materials are effective and look contemporary.
  • Café spills out onto pavement to create interest to street.
  • Underground parking added large costs to scheme but added value to building.

Vermuyden Centre (Thorn, Doncaster Lift)

  • Very little control on job due to type of contract.
  • Poor details in places as cost drove everything.
  • Need to develop flexibility of approach to constraints forced upon us.
12 Apr 2007

Design Review Notes: Colour

colours.jpg
  • Colours – Each colour has a psychological effect that should be considered as part of the overall colour scheme.
  • Examples:        
    • Orange – Social space
    • Blue – Calming
  • At Walkergate the wayfinding strategy is enhanced by the use of colour to differentiate departments and uses within the building.
  • Colours are chosen for each department that complement the type of healing taking place or the patient needs in each area.
  • Colour helped to differentiate the departments’ identities that had come together in the building
  • The colour of a department is expressed on the signage via a coloured disk.
  • Colour can be expressed in paint – or through a coloured material e.g. wallpaper
  • All finishes within Walkergate are co-ordinated e.g. floors; walls; seating; duvet covers; curtains and IPS units. Do not let one colour dominate a colour scheme in a room.
  • Bright colours, e.g. behind reception, attract eyes and demand attention.
  • In bedrooms, strong colours are positioned behind the bed so they do not demand attention all the time.
  • On long corridors, WC areas are expressed with colour to help with identification.
  • When choosing colour tones, consideration should be given to orientation of rooms. In north facing rooms colours will appear darker.
  • Client brief important e.g. Nuffield Hospital wanted boutique Hotel look.
  • Look at precedents and fashions on the high street for inspiration – what do Mr and Mrs Jones want?
  • Colour wheel – opposites on colour wheel are complimentary.
  • Accent colour – choose one accent colour in each room.
  • Dulux diamond matt – hard wearing and water based and is therefore a useful product.
19 Jan 2007

Design Review 3 - Coatham Links Leisure Centre

coatham-links-pk-sketch-2.jpg
  • Vision of Redcar + Cleveland Council to regenerate Redcar by creating new Leisure and shopping hub in the Links area
  • Development with Persimmon  won in competition
  • Masterplan based around creation of a link Axis from Church to Waterfront
    • Apartments to waterfront
    • Housing behind apartments
    • Public zone on eastern edge of the site, to include Extreme Sports, Bingo, Visitor Centre, Leisure Centre, Pub, Shops, Medical Centre, Parking, etc
  • Previous schemes by Carey Jones (visitor centre)  and Limbrick (leisure centre) have been abandoned. New schemes developed by P+HS Architects
  • Planning Application submitted mid 2006
  • Early schemes involved the development of the Brief, which had been basic and incomplete
  • Early elevation design created issues with Planning Authority and a number of issues were explored further and refined.
  • Concepts for revised elevations follow Marine theme
    • Curving roof
    • Fin walls omitted
    • Local material – brick and render
    • Durable materials at ground floor to limit effects of vandalism
  • Sporting Consultants involved to confirm brief and functional requirements.
    • No views into sporting areas from outside impact on elevations
  • P+HS keen to maintain high quality of design for when the scheme reaches Construciton phase, e.g carry out early detail design as part of pre-tender works.
  • AT future review on maintaining design integrity through detailing will be useful
12 Dec 2006

Design review 2 - Walkergate

  • Let’s talk about some buildings we like
  • Venice house, Paris social housing, Paris art gallery
  • Do buildings need to look like their function?
  • Sonia, Steve – Design review and technical review
  • CABE design statement as the format – good way to present schemes
  • Technical design review
  •  
  • Walkergate
  •  
  • Timetable
  • Financial close July 2007 – no steel frame designed
  • Project team structure
  • Review process – CABE
  • Site background
  • What was the purpose of the Aedas PSC – did it work?
  • Non-institutional domestic feel – up to 35 years there
  • Challenged space standards – esp bedrooms
  • Basic strategy – get it right first then deal with detail
  • Look at the site and listen to the planners [trees]
  • Fire strategy
  • Failure to understand drawings – codebook not enough – use 3D sketchup?
  • Although different colours by department, all clinical whbs same colour throughout
  • Early sign up to design by client
  • Early sign up to materials by contractor
  • Colour as wayfinding
  • Audit of design – cost penalty if the building didn’t perform within defined limits
  • Use of natural light aids healing, “suncool” glass, overheating etc
  • Flexibility – steel frame and metal stuff – sound?
  • [look at piling rig]
  • External envelope mad up of different systems
  • Roof not resolved – better design?
  • [anti-lig design guide]
12 Dec 2006

Design review 1 - Carlisle MH West

  • Design goes off-grid – why cranked? Addresses road side and easterly light, but most beds face west
  • New part L – lots of external wall etc? SBEM done – won’t meet Part M with conventional boilers, but will with boimass boilers – otherwise more solar thermal on roofs and walls
  • Alternative construction – talking to Yorkon and others
  • How do you clean high level windows?
  • How do you maintain some high-level facades?
  • Height for access/safety – off-set double pitch helps and maintains domestic appearance
  • Mono-pitch – more emphasis on road side
  • Cedum roof – within pitch constraints – reduces water run-off
  • Render to gables etc – prevents completion of lower roof
  • UPVC v aluminium
  • Steel frame needed for traditional construction
  • Timber frame – not considered
  • Heating – concrete slab with heating in waffles –Thermocast?
  • Underfloor – not flexible enough and not enough user control
  • Modular – will the design change? No
  • Circulation? About 38%
  • Service walkways? How do you get around the corners? Safe egress?
  • Basements – why not?